Economic Development Agenda
Assisting the State Authorities in Developing and Implementing Economic Reforms
Annual Study of the Competitiveness of Ukraine's Regions
Assisting Ukraine's Regions in Developing and Implementing Economic Growth Strategies
Public debates on important topics of economic and business development in Ukraine
Would a free market with the EU bring more benefits to Ukraine than a Customs Union with Russia?
Increasing government spending will prevent the 2nd wave of crisis in Ukraine
Ukraine is too poor to invest in green energy
Economic reforms will help eliminate corruption in Ukraine
Emigration of skilled labor is good for Ukraine's economy
Hosting of major sports events is good for a nation's health
Capitals should be key drivers of countries’ economic development
A free land market will destroy the Ukrainian village
The state is a better provider of and investor in health care than the private sector
International conference: «What is freedom of speech?»
Development of tourism in Ukraine should be a priority
State financial support is needed to encourage innovations
Free market capitalism has failed the former soviet states
Special economic zones are necessary for increasing Ukraine`s competitiveness
Ukrainian higher education produces uncompetitive graduates
Ukraine will not overcome the economic crisis without Russia
Decentralization will boost regions’ competitiveness
Ukraine should introduce tax reform despite the economic crisis
The state should stop subsidizing enterprises during the crisis
Crisis – the best time for the long-term economic reform
Ukraine Needs Agricultural Land Market Now
Contributing to EURO 2012 preparations in Ukraine



11.05.2012
Union Based on Gas Issue
07.05.2012
Âîïðîñ «õëåáà» è ñâîáîäû
07.05.2012
×åðåç Çàïàä íà Âîñòîê
26.04.2012
Èãîðü Ãîí÷àðåíêî: "Êèåâ äîëæåí àêòèâíî ðàáîòàòü íàä ïðèâëå÷åíèåì âíåøíèõ ôèíàíñîâûõ ðåñóðñîâ"
24.04.2012
FTA with EU or a Customs Union: Experts Say What is Better for Ukraine
all news

Newsletter #24 Public debate: «Economic reforms will help eliminate corruption in Ukraine»

Newsletter #23 Public debate: “Emigration of skilled labour is good for Ukraine's economy”

Newsletter #22 Public debate: “Capitals should be key drivers of countries’ economic development”

Newsletter # 21 Public debate: «A free land market will destroy the Ukrainian village»




Ukraine is currently facing the challenge to rebuild its economy after dramatic recession caused by the crisis. Even though the necessity of general business environment improvement is not to be underestimated its economic effect could well be increased if coupled by fostering the potential of a few promising sectors with high spillover effect. As the country is facing growing world competition in its traditional export markets and is additionally constrained by the bad state of government finance it is particularly important to prioritise those sectors wisely. Ukraine’s beneficial geographical position together with its historical and natural heritage is bringing tourism into the radar of public discussion in that respect. In order to return to the sustainable growth path Ukraine should consider targeted development of few high growth potential sectors with substantial spillover effect on the rest of the economy

Does tourism have a high growth potential in Ukraine? Can the sector provide significant return on investments in short to medium term? Is its development in line with Ukraine’s long-term social and economic goals?

“For the motion” arguments
Tourism represents around a third of global service trade. In many countries tourism is the largest contributor to national GDP, for example, in Croatia it contributes 17% to the country’s economy. Ukraine has a great tourism potential, which is based on its unique geographical position and a variety of tourism sights, ranging from ski resorts in the Carpathians to the Kazantip music fest and Black Sea beaches. However, this potential is currently heavily underused. Around 20 mn people cross the Ukrainian border annually, while the average amount spent per person is only $200 which is twice lower than in Russian and 3 times lower than in Poland, reaching the level of Russia could bring Ukraine additional revenue of $4bn a year.

Given its great tourism potential Ukraine should play its card right.

The country can also benefit from indirect effects of tourism development. Tourism stimulates growth in related industries like retail trade and construction, creates demand for higher value-added services, and encourages development of small and medium enterprises. Furthermore, according to statistics, in Ukraine creation one workplace in tourism is tenfold cheaper than in manufacturing. Tourism development has a substantial economic and social spillover effect

Experience of former socialist countries like Bulgaria or Croatia demonstrates that emerging economies can become highly successful tourist destinations. Effective promotion strategy and good site management can well be enough for a start. Moreover, preparation for the Euro 2012 Championship will help to solve problems with transport infrastructure, accommodation and recreation facilities in the largest cities. It will also present a good opportunity to promote Ukraine’s tourism brand worldwide.

“Against the motion” arguments
Tourism development may not require significant government spending at an early stage

In order to attract high income tourists Ukraine should invest a lot into infrastructure, building and renovation of hotels and other tourist facilities, service improvement and country brand promotion. Considering low level of business sophistication and high share of shadow economy in the country, those investments will take too long to payback and would not lead to substantial tax inflow into state budget; on the other hand, modernisation in agriculture and manufacturing industries can provide high returns already in a short run while taxes in those areas are much easier to collect. There are much better value-for-money options currently available both for investors and the government

Statistics demonstrate that tourism demand growth has slowed down in the past few years and the market is potentially approaching its saturation stage. With tourism supply continuing to increase the industry is not going to be very attractive for newcomers unless they feel confident they could cut off substantial market share from the incumbents. Ukraine should better look for more promising high growth potential sectors. World tourism market is not going to be so attractive in the years to come.

The country does not really have any unique tourism attraction, which could compete with such worldwide renowned heritage sites as Egyptian pyramids or natural wonders. Moreover, bringing tourism infrastructure up to a reasonable standard would take years. Therefore, Ukraine is unlikely to be competitive both in the world and regional tourism markets.

Ukraine’s tourism value proposition is not competitive
The question of whether tourism development should be prioritised in Ukraine will be discussed at the public debate organised by the Foundation for Effective Governance in partnership with London-based Intelligence Squared on 28th of October 2010 in Kyiv, Ukraine



print friendly version


Foundation for Effective Governance
23F Kudrjavska Street Kiev 04053, Ukraine
Reception: +380 44 501 41 00 PR Department: +380 44 501 41 07 Fax: + 380 44 501 41 05   
e-mail: feg@feg.org.ua
© 2007 - 2010 Foundation for Effective Governance. All rights reserved.
© 2007 - 2010 design and implementation by mc design.